Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffet's insurance company, announced that they will be splitting it's company B-stock in a 50-1 split. The notoriously high traded stock will now trade around $65 at these levels making more accessible to everybody. I believe this is now a great pick for your long term portfolio. I imagine it will start to be more aggressively accumulated by institutional money now and will only go up from here.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/berkshire-approves-50-for-1-class-b-stock-split-2009-11-03
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Monday, November 2, 2009
The Weakening Dollar Will Eventually Hurt Us
This opinion in yesterday's FT by Nouriel Roubini helps explain what's been driving up the markets and how it can eventually blow up in our faces when the dollar gets stronger. The slingshot performance of the markets in the last week is a preview of what will happen a few months from now.
Mother of all carry trades faces an inevitable bust
By Nouriel Roubini
Published: November 1 2009 18:44 | Last updated: November 1 2009 18:44
Since March there has been a massive rally in all sorts of risky assets – equities, oil, energy and commodity prices – a narrowing of high-yield and high-grade credit spreads, and an even bigger rally in emerging market asset classes (their stocks, bonds and currencies). At the same time, the dollar has weakened sharply , while government bond yields have gently increased but stayed low and stable.
This recovery in risky assets is in part driven by better economic fundamentals. We avoided a near depression and financial sector meltdown with a massive monetary, fiscal stimulus and bank bail-outs. Whether the recovery is V-shaped, as consensus believes, or U-shaped and anaemic as I have argued, asset prices should be moving gradually higher.
But while the US and global economy have begun a modest recovery, asset prices have gone through the roof since March in a major and synchronised rally. While asset prices were falling sharply in 2008, when the dollar was rallying, they have recovered sharply since March while the dollar is tanking. Risky asset prices have risen too much, too soon and too fast compared with macroeconomic fundamentals.
So what is behind this massive rally? Certainly it has been helped by a wave of liquidity from near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing. But a more important factor fuelling this asset bubble is the weakness of the US dollar, driven by the mother of all carry trades. The US dollar has become the major funding currency of carry trades as the Fed has kept interest rates on hold and is expected to do so for a long time. Investors who are shorting the US dollar to buy on a highly leveraged basis higher-yielding assets and other global assets are not just borrowing at zero interest rates in dollar terms; they are borrowing at very negative interest rates – as low as negative 10 or 20 per cent annualised – as the fall in the US dollar leads to massive capital gains on short dollar positions.
Let us sum up: traders are borrowing at negative 20 per cent rates to invest on a highly leveraged basis on a mass of risky global assets that are rising in price due to excess liquidity and a massive carry trade. Every investor who plays this risky game looks like a genius – even if they are just riding a huge bubble financed by a large negative cost of borrowing – as the total returns have been in the 50-70 per cent range since March.
People’s sense of the value at risk (VAR) of their aggregate portfolios ought, instead, to have been increasing due to a rising correlation of the risks between different asset classes, all of which are driven by this common monetary policy and the carry trade. In effect, it has become one big common trade – you short the dollar to buy any global risky assets.
Yet, at the same time, the perceived riskiness of individual asset classes is declining as volatility is diminished due to the Fed’s policy of buying everything in sight – witness its proposed $1,800bn (£1,000bn, €1,200bn) purchase of Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities (bonds guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise such as Fannie Mae) and agency debt. By effectively reducing the volatility of individual asset classes, making them behave the same way, there is now little diversification across markets – the VAR again looks low.
So the combined effect of the Fed policy of a zero Fed funds rate, quantitative easing and massive purchase of long-term debt instruments is seemingly making the world safe – for now – for the mother of all carry trades and mother of all highly leveraged global asset bubbles.
While this policy feeds the global asset bubble it is also feeding a new US asset bubble. Easy money, quantitative easing, credit easing and massive inflows of capital into the US via an accumulation of forex reserves by foreign central banks makes US fiscal deficits easier to fund and feeds the US equity and credit bubble. Finally, a weak dollar is good for US equities as it may lead to higher growth and makes the foreign currency profits of US corporations abroad greater in dollar terms.
The reckless US policy that is feeding these carry trades is forcing other countries to follow its easy monetary policy. Near-zero policy rates and quantitative easing were already in place in the UK, eurozone, Japan, Sweden and other advanced economies, but the dollar weakness is making this global monetary easing worse. Central banks in Asia and Latin America are worried about dollar weakness and are aggressively intervening to stop excessive currency appreciation. This is keeping short-term rates lower than is desirable. Central banks may also be forced to lower interest rates through domestic open market operations. Some central banks, concerned about the hot money driving up their currencies, as in Brazil, are imposing controls on capital inflows. Either way, the carry trade bubble will get worse: if there is no forex intervention and foreign currencies appreciate, the negative borrowing cost of the carry trade becomes more negative. If intervention or open market operations control currency appreciation, the ensuing domestic monetary easing feeds an asset bubble in these economies. So the perfectly correlated bubble across all global asset classes gets bigger by the day.
But one day this bubble will burst, leading to the biggest co-ordinated asset bust ever: if factors lead the dollar to reverse and suddenly appreciate – as was seen in previous reversals, such as the yen-funded carry trade – the leveraged carry trade will have to be suddenly closed as investors cover their dollar shorts. A stampede will occur as closing long leveraged risky asset positions across all asset classes funded by dollar shorts triggers a co-ordinated collapse of all those risky assets – equities, commodities, emerging market asset classes and credit instruments.
Why will these carry trades unravel? First, the dollar cannot fall to zero and at some point it will stabilise; when that happens the cost of borrowing in dollars will suddenly become zero, rather than highly negative, and the riskiness of a reversal of dollar movements would induce many to cover their shorts. Second, the Fed cannot suppress volatility forever – its $1,800bn purchase plan will be over by next spring. Third, if US growth surprises on the upside in the third and fourth quarters, markets may start to expect a Fed tightening to come sooner, not later. Fourth, there could be a flight from risk prompted by fear of a double dip recession or geopolitical risks, such as a military confrontation between the US/Israel and Iran. As in 2008, when such a rise in risk aversion was associated with a sharp appreciation of the dollar, as investors sought the safety of US Treasuries, this renewed risk aversion would trigger a dollar rally at a time when huge short dollar positions will have to be closed.
This unraveling may not occur for a while, as easy money and excessive global liquidity can push asset prices higher for a while. But the longer and bigger the carry trades and the larger the asset bubble, the bigger will be the ensuing asset bubble crash. The Fed and other policymakers seem unaware of the monster bubble they are creating. The longer they remain blind, the harder the markets will fall.
The writer is a professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business and chairman of Roubini Global Economics
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9a5b3216-c70b-11de-bb6f-00144feab49a.html
Mother of all carry trades faces an inevitable bust
By Nouriel Roubini
Published: November 1 2009 18:44 | Last updated: November 1 2009 18:44
Since March there has been a massive rally in all sorts of risky assets – equities, oil, energy and commodity prices – a narrowing of high-yield and high-grade credit spreads, and an even bigger rally in emerging market asset classes (their stocks, bonds and currencies). At the same time, the dollar has weakened sharply , while government bond yields have gently increased but stayed low and stable.
This recovery in risky assets is in part driven by better economic fundamentals. We avoided a near depression and financial sector meltdown with a massive monetary, fiscal stimulus and bank bail-outs. Whether the recovery is V-shaped, as consensus believes, or U-shaped and anaemic as I have argued, asset prices should be moving gradually higher.
But while the US and global economy have begun a modest recovery, asset prices have gone through the roof since March in a major and synchronised rally. While asset prices were falling sharply in 2008, when the dollar was rallying, they have recovered sharply since March while the dollar is tanking. Risky asset prices have risen too much, too soon and too fast compared with macroeconomic fundamentals.
So what is behind this massive rally? Certainly it has been helped by a wave of liquidity from near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing. But a more important factor fuelling this asset bubble is the weakness of the US dollar, driven by the mother of all carry trades. The US dollar has become the major funding currency of carry trades as the Fed has kept interest rates on hold and is expected to do so for a long time. Investors who are shorting the US dollar to buy on a highly leveraged basis higher-yielding assets and other global assets are not just borrowing at zero interest rates in dollar terms; they are borrowing at very negative interest rates – as low as negative 10 or 20 per cent annualised – as the fall in the US dollar leads to massive capital gains on short dollar positions.
Let us sum up: traders are borrowing at negative 20 per cent rates to invest on a highly leveraged basis on a mass of risky global assets that are rising in price due to excess liquidity and a massive carry trade. Every investor who plays this risky game looks like a genius – even if they are just riding a huge bubble financed by a large negative cost of borrowing – as the total returns have been in the 50-70 per cent range since March.
People’s sense of the value at risk (VAR) of their aggregate portfolios ought, instead, to have been increasing due to a rising correlation of the risks between different asset classes, all of which are driven by this common monetary policy and the carry trade. In effect, it has become one big common trade – you short the dollar to buy any global risky assets.
Yet, at the same time, the perceived riskiness of individual asset classes is declining as volatility is diminished due to the Fed’s policy of buying everything in sight – witness its proposed $1,800bn (£1,000bn, €1,200bn) purchase of Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities (bonds guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise such as Fannie Mae) and agency debt. By effectively reducing the volatility of individual asset classes, making them behave the same way, there is now little diversification across markets – the VAR again looks low.
So the combined effect of the Fed policy of a zero Fed funds rate, quantitative easing and massive purchase of long-term debt instruments is seemingly making the world safe – for now – for the mother of all carry trades and mother of all highly leveraged global asset bubbles.
While this policy feeds the global asset bubble it is also feeding a new US asset bubble. Easy money, quantitative easing, credit easing and massive inflows of capital into the US via an accumulation of forex reserves by foreign central banks makes US fiscal deficits easier to fund and feeds the US equity and credit bubble. Finally, a weak dollar is good for US equities as it may lead to higher growth and makes the foreign currency profits of US corporations abroad greater in dollar terms.
The reckless US policy that is feeding these carry trades is forcing other countries to follow its easy monetary policy. Near-zero policy rates and quantitative easing were already in place in the UK, eurozone, Japan, Sweden and other advanced economies, but the dollar weakness is making this global monetary easing worse. Central banks in Asia and Latin America are worried about dollar weakness and are aggressively intervening to stop excessive currency appreciation. This is keeping short-term rates lower than is desirable. Central banks may also be forced to lower interest rates through domestic open market operations. Some central banks, concerned about the hot money driving up their currencies, as in Brazil, are imposing controls on capital inflows. Either way, the carry trade bubble will get worse: if there is no forex intervention and foreign currencies appreciate, the negative borrowing cost of the carry trade becomes more negative. If intervention or open market operations control currency appreciation, the ensuing domestic monetary easing feeds an asset bubble in these economies. So the perfectly correlated bubble across all global asset classes gets bigger by the day.
But one day this bubble will burst, leading to the biggest co-ordinated asset bust ever: if factors lead the dollar to reverse and suddenly appreciate – as was seen in previous reversals, such as the yen-funded carry trade – the leveraged carry trade will have to be suddenly closed as investors cover their dollar shorts. A stampede will occur as closing long leveraged risky asset positions across all asset classes funded by dollar shorts triggers a co-ordinated collapse of all those risky assets – equities, commodities, emerging market asset classes and credit instruments.
Why will these carry trades unravel? First, the dollar cannot fall to zero and at some point it will stabilise; when that happens the cost of borrowing in dollars will suddenly become zero, rather than highly negative, and the riskiness of a reversal of dollar movements would induce many to cover their shorts. Second, the Fed cannot suppress volatility forever – its $1,800bn purchase plan will be over by next spring. Third, if US growth surprises on the upside in the third and fourth quarters, markets may start to expect a Fed tightening to come sooner, not later. Fourth, there could be a flight from risk prompted by fear of a double dip recession or geopolitical risks, such as a military confrontation between the US/Israel and Iran. As in 2008, when such a rise in risk aversion was associated with a sharp appreciation of the dollar, as investors sought the safety of US Treasuries, this renewed risk aversion would trigger a dollar rally at a time when huge short dollar positions will have to be closed.
This unraveling may not occur for a while, as easy money and excessive global liquidity can push asset prices higher for a while. But the longer and bigger the carry trades and the larger the asset bubble, the bigger will be the ensuing asset bubble crash. The Fed and other policymakers seem unaware of the monster bubble they are creating. The longer they remain blind, the harder the markets will fall.
The writer is a professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business and chairman of Roubini Global Economics
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9a5b3216-c70b-11de-bb6f-00144feab49a.html
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Las Vegas Sands up 17% on earnings
Wynn Resorts Ltd. (NASDAQ: WYNN) may have set a high bar for Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE: LVS) and its earnings report today, but cost cuts helped the company to beat its estimates. Las Vegas Sands reported GAAP net income of $62.4 million, but the non-GAAP operating income was $0.03 EPS and revenue was $1.14 billion. Thomson Reuters had estimates pegged at -$0.01 EPS and $1.17 billion in revenues. That is another instance of cost savings helping the bottom-line more than the top-line seeing improvements.
In the Vegas set it seems that cost savings helped to overcome weak table revenues. What is interesting is that the company said it had a record quarter regarding future group room night bookings. It also noted that it has more groups already on the books for 2010 than it expects to realize for all of 2009.
The company’s annualized cost savings will exceed $500 million across the company and it continues to look for opportunities on the cost front. That was 90% realized for the year as of September 30. Las Vegas Sands’ unrestricted cash balance at the end of the quarter was $3.09 billion and total debt outstanding was $11.76 billion.
Shares closed up 12% at $14.76 today, and shares are trading around $15.48 (5%) shortly after the report in the after-hours session!!
http://247wallst.com/2009/10/29/les-vegas-sands-wins-on-cost-cuts-lvs-wynn/
In the Vegas set it seems that cost savings helped to overcome weak table revenues. What is interesting is that the company said it had a record quarter regarding future group room night bookings. It also noted that it has more groups already on the books for 2010 than it expects to realize for all of 2009.
The company’s annualized cost savings will exceed $500 million across the company and it continues to look for opportunities on the cost front. That was 90% realized for the year as of September 30. Las Vegas Sands’ unrestricted cash balance at the end of the quarter was $3.09 billion and total debt outstanding was $11.76 billion.
Shares closed up 12% at $14.76 today, and shares are trading around $15.48 (5%) shortly after the report in the after-hours session!!
http://247wallst.com/2009/10/29/les-vegas-sands-wins-on-cost-cuts-lvs-wynn/
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
BP's up 5% after earnings report
BP buoys petroleum shares in sector rebound
By Steve Gelsi, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- BP shares paced gainers in the petroleum sector as energy stocks rebounded Tuesday from two straight days of losses and crude prices rose on an expected drop in weekly petroleum inventories.
BP 57.97, +2.49, +4.49%
XOI 1,096, +9.84, +0.91%
Investors sifted through better-than-expected earnings from BP (NYSE:BP) and a steep loss from refining giant Valero (NYSE:VLO) .
Crude oil for December delivery rose 48 cents, or 0.5%, to $79.09 a barrel, rebounding from morning weakness.
Analysts expect a build of 900,000 barrels in U.S. commercial crude stocks for the week ended Oct. 23, according to analysts polled by Platts. They also project a decline of 1 million barrels in gasoline stocks and a drop of 1.1 million barrels in distillate inventories
The NYSE Arca Oil Index (INDEX:XOI) rose 1.6% to 1,104.
The NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (INDEX:XNG) rose 1.7% to 520.
The Philadelphia Oil Service Index (INDEX:OSX) fell 0.1% to 200.
BP rallied 5.7% to $58.63 after the company's adjusted profit of $4.98 billion soundly beat the analyst estimate of $3.2 billion. Adjusted production rose 4%, and BP's tax rate fell to 29% from 36%.
"BP's contribution to what is becoming a strong third quarter earnings season is likely to meet with broker upgrades, potentially strengthening the current market consensus even further from its current buy status," Richard Hunter, analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers, told the Houston Chronicle. See full story.
Meanwhile, shares of Valero fell 4.4% to $19.37 after the refiner said it lost nearly $500 million in the third quarter on costs for scaling back operations, and weak margins in the refining sector. See full story.
Among stocks in the spotlight, Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE:COG) drew an upgrade to overweight from neutral at J. P. Morgan, following the company's third-quarter earnings.
Analysts cited the company's results in the Marcellus and Haynesville regions, as well as its above-average production growth. Cabot's third-quarter operating earnings of 38 cents a share topped J.P. Morgan's forecast of 36 cents a share.
Shares of Cabot rose 10% to $42.13.
National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV) fell 2% to $43.38 after the company drew a downgrade from Tudor Pickering Holt to hold from accumulate.
After an 81% rise so far this year, the stock has reached Tudor Pickering's target valuation. A slower build up in orders from Brazil also removes a potential near-term catalyst to buy the stock, Tudor Pickering said.
"Good company, executing exceptionally, but we've gotten paid for it and now time to wait for re-entry point (maybe high $30's)," the analysts wrote in a note to clients.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bp-up-valero-down-in-mixed-energy-sector-action-2009-10-27?siteid=yhoof
By Steve Gelsi, MarketWatch
NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- BP shares paced gainers in the petroleum sector as energy stocks rebounded Tuesday from two straight days of losses and crude prices rose on an expected drop in weekly petroleum inventories.
BP 57.97, +2.49, +4.49%
XOI 1,096, +9.84, +0.91%
Investors sifted through better-than-expected earnings from BP (NYSE:BP) and a steep loss from refining giant Valero (NYSE:VLO) .
Crude oil for December delivery rose 48 cents, or 0.5%, to $79.09 a barrel, rebounding from morning weakness.
Analysts expect a build of 900,000 barrels in U.S. commercial crude stocks for the week ended Oct. 23, according to analysts polled by Platts. They also project a decline of 1 million barrels in gasoline stocks and a drop of 1.1 million barrels in distillate inventories
The NYSE Arca Oil Index (INDEX:XOI) rose 1.6% to 1,104.
The NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (INDEX:XNG) rose 1.7% to 520.
The Philadelphia Oil Service Index (INDEX:OSX) fell 0.1% to 200.
BP rallied 5.7% to $58.63 after the company's adjusted profit of $4.98 billion soundly beat the analyst estimate of $3.2 billion. Adjusted production rose 4%, and BP's tax rate fell to 29% from 36%.
"BP's contribution to what is becoming a strong third quarter earnings season is likely to meet with broker upgrades, potentially strengthening the current market consensus even further from its current buy status," Richard Hunter, analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers, told the Houston Chronicle. See full story.
Meanwhile, shares of Valero fell 4.4% to $19.37 after the refiner said it lost nearly $500 million in the third quarter on costs for scaling back operations, and weak margins in the refining sector. See full story.
Among stocks in the spotlight, Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE:COG) drew an upgrade to overweight from neutral at J. P. Morgan, following the company's third-quarter earnings.
Analysts cited the company's results in the Marcellus and Haynesville regions, as well as its above-average production growth. Cabot's third-quarter operating earnings of 38 cents a share topped J.P. Morgan's forecast of 36 cents a share.
Shares of Cabot rose 10% to $42.13.
National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV) fell 2% to $43.38 after the company drew a downgrade from Tudor Pickering Holt to hold from accumulate.
After an 81% rise so far this year, the stock has reached Tudor Pickering's target valuation. A slower build up in orders from Brazil also removes a potential near-term catalyst to buy the stock, Tudor Pickering said.
"Good company, executing exceptionally, but we've gotten paid for it and now time to wait for re-entry point (maybe high $30's)," the analysts wrote in a note to clients.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bp-up-valero-down-in-mixed-energy-sector-action-2009-10-27?siteid=yhoof
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Thursday, October 15, 2009
BUY OIL OIL OIL SERVICE NAMES!!
Oil is just starting to catch up to gold and other commodities in the last few weeks and it has a long way to go. There is a perfect storm of factors (weak dollar, tremendous uncertainty, a bullish equity market) that is conducive to a commodities boom right now and oil names will benefit. I think the best way to invest on this theme, is to buy oil service companies. Oil service companies are suppliers of equipment or services to oil fields and offshore platforms, such as drilling, exploration, and construction. Transocean, Diamond Offshore, Noble, Halliburton, Baker-Hughes, and Schlumberger are some examples. Instead of picking 1, you can use oil service ETF's which contain a basket of most of these companies. My favorites are: OIH, PXJ, and IEZ. You can use 2x leverage by using DIG and 3x leverage using the ERX, but be careful as you can lose money as quickly as you can make it. If you totally disagree with me, you can short sell with 2x leverage by using DUG. Oil is just gonna get higher from here ($77) over the next couple months.
On another note:
It is possible to manage your investments on your own!! The performance of the stock market in last decade taught us that buying and holding index funds for 30 years is not the best way to manage your money. Do you really want to look back when you're ready to retire and realize you have the same amount or less money than you put in 20 years ago, but if you did it right you could have 10x that or more?? You have to be flexible and aggressive when the markets call for it, and have the discipline to sell and get defensive when times are tough. This can be done...more on this topic later.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Dow hits 10,000, how much further can we go?
The Dow hit a psychological milestone today by getting over 10,000, a place it hasn't been in over a year. Now is a good time to look back at your decisions of the past year and evaluate how you've done. Did you stay the course when it looked like the world was going to end at the beginning of the year? Did you abandon ship and get out of the market entirely and switch to cash?? Were you fearless and undeterred and voraciously bought stocks when they were at their cheapest and have since doubled or tripled your money??
I wish I can say I was fearless...that I realized that the recession wasn't going to turn into a depression...that I foresaw March as the greatest buying opportunity in our lifetime. That couldn't be further from the truth. Back then, I was extremely bearish on the banks and the economy. I thought we were headed for an apocalypse. I was so confident that we were gonna crash that I tried to profit from the peril by shorting all the bank stocks, certain that they were gonna go to zero within a month. I was so sure that stocks were going lower that I sold most of my families mutual funds (except for gold) in an effort to avoid further losses. A couple days after I did all this, Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citi announced that their 1st quarter losses were going to be much smaller than previously thought. The market took off. Shortly there after, Wells Fargo was so excited to announce their positive 1st quarter earnings numbers that they announced a week early, catching the markets by surprise...the Dow took off again.
At this point I lost a significant amount of money, but I was still undeterred in my bearish view and believed that this positive upswing was temporary. I couldn't fathom that after months of hearing how bad things are gonna get, that the situation was already starting to get better. Didn't make sense to me. I bet more aggressively against the market in my personal account. Then the federal government announced it was coming to the aid of all the distressed banks and basically decided to help the whole economy by throwing hundreds of billions of dollars and, well you know what happens in the ensuing months.
I remained bearish on the economy till about June. I was constantly waiting for the downturn and placed bearish bets accordingly. I thought my friends that were buying into the rally were nuts. Were they not looking at the same facts that I was??? Finally, I realized that I was playing the stock market that was in my head and not the one that was actually happening right in front of me. Why was I fighting this bullish run? I adopted more of a, "if you can't beat'em, join'em," and things started to get better from there.
The market was on fire and I was finally on the right side of it. The riskiest stocks were the one's going up the most because they got beat up the most. I started investing in commodities, oil and gas stocks, technology, and biotech. There was one pre-conceived notion I had to get out of my head: I had to realize that you will never buy a stock at it's cheapest and you will never sell a stock at the top. I wouldn't buy a stock like Apple because it wasn't at 85 anymore, it was at 95. I kept trying to wait till it got back to 85, but it never did. Finally I decided to stop fighting the tape, suck it up, and buy it at $120. I still hold that position (it's $192 now!). With every stock that you own you have to ask yourself, "would I still buy this stock at this price?" If the answer is no, then you should sell it, if yes, then you should buy more of it.
You don't need a list of 50 stocks in your portfolio, especially if you don't have millions of dollars, you just need to find 4-8 good companies or ETF's, preferably in different industries so you have diversification, and slowly build positions in them over time. For example, I've built the following equity portfolio for one of my young clients and it's done quite well for her IRA:
20% in BP (oil company w/ 6.5% dividend) You can also use the OIH ETF to get oil exposure
20% XLK (technology ETF containing companies such as Apple, Google, RIMM, Intel, Cisco
20% XBI (Biotech ETF--pharma companies have lots of cash and are acquiring smaller biotech firms now cause they can pick them up for cheap valuations, but they are paying large premiums for them so it brings up the whole sector)
20% GLD and GDX (gold ETF and gold miners etf)
20% BIK (Emerging markets BRIC ETF-Brazil, China, Russia, India leading companies)
This is a good and simple aggressive portfolio for a young person who can take risk. She also has corporate bonds which pay steady interest to you and are more conservative.
Will the rally last forever?? Of course not, but you should ride it out while it lasts and make as much money as possible before it turns around. Don't try and pick the point it's gonna pullback, that's a loser's game and you will get burned. There's no reason for the markets to have a major pullback this year. There is too much money on the sidelines and big hedge funds need to show their clients that they're worth the 2% and 20% in fees that they charge so they have to participate in this rally and keep driving the markets up. Do I think we'll go much over 11000?? Doubtful as that bear in me still thinks there's lots of unresolved problems in this economy that need addressing, but I think 10500 is right around the corner.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
